This past week, not only the
Sakurai Prize for Theoretical Particle Physics was awarded but just yesterday the
Nobel prize in Physics, for "the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the
origin of mass of subatomic particles", was announced.
The main difference in the prizes is the money involved! Last week I visited CEA-Saclay and during after lunch coffee I met Kosower, whom was very happy for the receipment of this year's Sakurai prize, and he mentioned that the prize was U$D10.000 divided by three (the number of awardees). In contrast, the Nobel prize in 2013 is U$D 1.235million (to be divided between Englert and Higgs).
The Nobel prize in physics -- that can only be awarded to at most three people -- this year is also somehow controversial. While the Sakurai prize for the "Higgs boson" was awarded in 2010 to the six authors of the symmetry breaking Physical Review Letters (PRL) paper saga of the summer of 1964, the Nobel committee left out the three authors on the last paper of the discovery. Let me remind you that the first paper was submitted by Englert and Brout (who passed away in 2011 and hence could not be awarded the Nobel prize). Then Higgs submitted his paper on Aug. 31 1964 and, 48 days later, Guralnik, Hagen and Kibbles submitted their paper to PRL (for more details you can browse an older post on
my blog) which was published a month later.
There are also a lot of expectations regarding a Nobel prize for next year which is expected to be for the experimental discovery of the Higgs@CERN that this year was also not recognized.
In spite of all the drama and tension it is great to see that theoretical physics gets also a lot of recognition!
Before finishing my post let me just mention we had Thomas Dumitrescu at the High Energy Journal Club at Harvard telling us about "On Scale and Conformal
Invariance in Four Dimensions" based on
http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.2921